Reference synthesis
An editorial comparison of the route’s selected accounts and evidence.
A curated synthesis cannot be neutral or exhaustive. Follow the primary sources when an interpretation matters.
Finding the next step…
Build the bridge from Bayesian inference to predictive coding and active inference, then inspect its limits.
Comfort with conditional probability helps; use the Probability route if Bayes’ rule is new. The opening step separates a predictive model from the stronger free-energy claims.
A worked generative model plus an account of what could falsify it.
Start here if the background is new. Equivalent experience is enough.
Practise conditional probability before comparing generative and predictive accounts.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy editors · reference
Bayesian conditional probability and updating
Check reading access
Open the readingBayes’ Theorem. Work through one conditional-probability example and name the prior, likelihood and posterior.
Karl Friston · paper · 2010
Hierarchical predictions, errors and model assumptions
Check reading access
Open the readingAndy Clark · book · 2015
Hierarchical predictions, errors and model assumptions
Check reading access
Open the readingThe Free-Energy Principle: A Unified Brain Theory?. Separate the mathematical construction, biological assumptions and proposed empirical scope.
Surfing Uncertainty. Trace the account of hierarchical prediction and ask what role action plays.
Jakob Hohwy · book · 2013
Worked estimation examples and precision weighting
Check reading access
Open the readingKenji Doya et al. · book · 2007
Worked estimation examples and precision weighting
Check reading access
Open the readingThe Predictive Mind. Inspect how sensory evidence and prior expectations enter the perceptual-inference account.
Bayesian Brain. Choose a worked estimation example and track how uncertainty changes an update.
Karl Friston et al. · paper · 2016
Action, interoception and predicted sensory consequences
Check reading access
Open the readingAnil Seth · paper · 2013
Action, interoception and predicted sensory consequences
Check reading access
Open the readingActive Inference and Learning. Identify how an action changes the sensory evidence expected by the model.
Interoceptive Inference, Emotion, and the Embodied Self. Trace the proposed connection between bodily signals, predictions and experienced emotion.
Editorial perspectives based on selected works, rather than author-endorsed reading lists.
An editorial comparison of the route’s selected accounts and evidence.
A curated synthesis cannot be neutral or exhaustive. Follow the primary sources when an interpretation matters.
An editorial reconstruction using the selected work of Karl Friston.
This is not an author-endorsed syllabus. The reconstruction highlights selected works and may omit other commitments.
An editorial reconstruction using the selected work of Andy Clark.
This is not an author-endorsed syllabus. The reconstruction highlights selected works and may omit other commitments.
An editorial reconstruction using the selected work of Jakob Hohwy.
This is not an author-endorsed syllabus. The reconstruction highlights selected works and may omit other commitments.
Background, different viewpoints, and further reading.
Separate the mathematical construction, biological assumptions and proposed empirical scope.
Hierarchical predictions, errors and model assumptions
Identify how an action changes the sensory evidence expected by the model.
Action, interoception and predicted sensory consequences
Trace the account of hierarchical prediction and ask what role action plays.
Hierarchical predictions, errors and model assumptions
Inspect how sensory evidence and prior expectations enter the perceptual-inference account.
Worked estimation examples and precision weighting
Choose a worked estimation example and track how uncertainty changes an update.
Worked estimation examples and precision weighting
Annotate one equation’s variables and the assumptions linking it to neural processing.
One formal model and its stated assumptions
Extract one claim and distinguish the evidence supporting it from the author’s interpretation.
Full paper; methods and limitations
Trace the proposed connection between bodily signals, predictions and experienced emotion.
Action, interoception and predicted sensory consequences
Select one formal model and compare its assumptions with the simpler toy example.
One formal model and its stated assumptions
Compare this account’s mechanism with the preceding reading; note where their predictions differ.
Selected chapters and argument
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Work through one conditional-probability example and name the prior, likelihood and posterior.
Bayesian conditional probability and updating
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use a delayed-response task to compare predictive accounts with other explanations of memory.