Reference synthesis
An editorial comparison of the route’s selected accounts and evidence.
A curated synthesis cannot be neutral or exhaustive. Follow the primary sources when an interpretation matters.
Finding the next step…
Connect structural causal models, identification, invariant prediction and counterfactual explanations.
Basic probability, directed graphs and simple modelling are required. Start with Probability and Causality if these are unfamiliar; Python helps with optional simulations.
A causal analysis that separates predictive accuracy from intervention validity.
Start here if the background is new. Equivalent experience is enough.
Use causal diagrams, interventions and assumption checks to assess a model’s causal claims.
Use conditional probability to separate an observed association from an intervention question.
Pearl, Glymour · Jewell · book · 2016
Interventions, graphs and confounding
Check reading access
Open the readingStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy editors · reference
Interventions, graphs and confounding
Check reading access
Open the readingCausal Inference in Statistics: A Primer. Use one small graph to distinguish observational association, confounding and intervention.
Causal Models. Draw a small graph and distinguish a correlation from an intervention question.
Judea Pearl · book · 2000
Graph-based identification and structural assumptions
Check reading access
Open the readingPeters, Janzing · Schölkopf · book · 2017
Graph-based identification and structural assumptions
Check reading access
Open the readingCausality. Use a selected graph-based argument to identify the assumptions behind an intervention claim.
Elements of Causal Inference. Inspect one identification strategy and a case where its assumptions fail.
Hernán · Robins · book · 2020
A confounded effect-estimation example
Check reading access
Open the readingPearl, Glymour · Jewell · book · 2016
Interventions, graphs and confounding
Check reading access
Open the readingCausal Inference: What If. Choose a worked adjustment example and list the identification assumptions.
Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer. Use one small graph to distinguish observational association, confounding and intervention.
Peters, Bühlmann · Meinshausen · paper · 2016
Cross-environment assumptions and invariance claims
Check reading access
Open the readingArjovsky et al. · paper · 2019
Cross-environment assumptions and invariance claims
Check reading access
Open the readingCausal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals. Record the environmental assumptions needed for the invariance claim to identify a cause.
Invariant Risk Minimization. Distinguish the optimisation proposal from a guarantee of causal identification.
Editorial perspectives based on selected works, rather than author-endorsed reading lists.
An editorial comparison of the route’s selected accounts and evidence.
A curated synthesis cannot be neutral or exhaustive. Follow the primary sources when an interpretation matters.
An editorial reconstruction using the selected work of Judea Pearl.
This is not an author-endorsed syllabus. The reconstruction highlights selected works and may omit other commitments.
An editorial reconstruction using the selected work of Bernhard Schölkopf.
This is not an author-endorsed syllabus. The reconstruction highlights selected works and may omit other commitments.
An editorial reconstruction using the selected work of Jonas Peters.
This is not an author-endorsed syllabus. The reconstruction highlights selected works and may omit other commitments.
Background, different viewpoints, and further reading.
Use a selected graph-based argument to identify the assumptions behind an intervention claim.
Graph-based identification and structural assumptions
Compare this account’s mechanism with the preceding reading; note where their predictions differ.
Selected chapters and argument
Inspect one identification strategy and a case where its assumptions fail.
Graph-based identification and structural assumptions
Use one small graph to distinguish observational association, confounding and intervention.
Interventions, graphs and confounding
Choose a worked adjustment example and list the identification assumptions.
A confounded effect-estimation example
Identify the proposed model class and what evidence could distinguish its causal account.
Causal representation and additive-noise model assumptions
Distinguish the optimisation proposal from a guarantee of causal identification.
Cross-environment assumptions and invariance claims
Record the environmental assumptions needed for the invariance claim to identify a cause.
Cross-environment assumptions and invariance claims
Reconstruct the main argument and identify the assumptions linking it to the route’s question.
Full paper; methods and limitations
Inspect the additive-noise and independence assumptions and try an alternative model.
Causal representation and additive-noise model assumptions
Extract one claim and distinguish the evidence supporting it from the author’s interpretation.
Full paper; methods and limitations
Draw a small graph and distinguish a correlation from an intervention question.
Interventions, graphs and confounding
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Use the entry’s distinctions and bibliography to test the route’s central argument, rather than treating a summary as a substitute for the primary source.
Named section and worked examples
Contrast held-out predictive performance with the validity of an intervention claim.